Accueil/Blog/Repairability Index and ESPR: How to Document Your Product's Repairability

Repairability Index and ESPR: How to Document Your Product's Repairability

"Our products are repairable" was once a marketing claim. It's now a documented obligation. Filling in a "repairable: yes" field is easy; proving it continuously is much harder. The real criteria for repairability, what audits actually examine, and how to move from declaration to proof.

Par ZIQY, Content TeamPublié le July 1, 2026Mis à jour le July 1, 20266 min read

📊 The essentials in one line

Repairability is no longer a marketing promise: it's data to prove. Between the repairability index, the durability index, and the ESPR digital passport, manufacturers must now document — rather than declare — the repairability of their products.


For a long time, "our products are repairable" was a sales argument. Today, it's a documented obligation. The French repairability index paved the way; ESPR generalizes this logic at the European level through the product digital passport.

For a manufacturer, this changes everything: it's no longer enough to claim that a product is repairable, you must prove it — parts, manuals, availability, service history. This article details the concrete criteria and how to document them.


What is the Repairability Index?

The repairability index is a score assigned to certain products to inform consumers about their ability to be repaired. Established in France, it foreshadows part of the requirements that the ESPR generalizes at the European level, and it is gradually evolving toward a broader durability index.

Repairability index, in one sentence: a score that translates, in an objective and comparable way, how much a product can be repaired rather than discarded.

💡 From the Repairability Index to the ESPR

The French repairability index is a precursor. The ESPR takes up and extends this logic at the European scale, integrating it into the digital product passport: repairability becomes a piece of data in the DPP, not just a score displayed on the shelf.

The Real Criteria for Repairability

Contrary to popular belief, repairability is not judged "by feel". It is based on precise and measurable criteria.

CriterionWhat is evaluated
🔩 DisassemblyCan the product be opened and repaired without destroying it? Necessary tools, component accessibility.
📄 Technical documentationRepair manuals available for professionals and consumers.
📦 Parts availabilityTime to supply spare parts after product purchase.
💶 Parts pricingCost of spare parts relative to the price of a new product.
⚙️ Category-specific criteriaDepending on the category: software updates for electronics, for example.

Key takeaway: each of these criteria requires real data, not an estimate. A parts availability timeframe must be accurate; a repair history must exist.

The Real Challenge: Document, Don't Just Declare

This is where most manufacturers struggle. Filling in a "repairable: yes" field is easy. Proving repairability continuously is much harder.

⚠️ What an audit really looks at

A repairability declaration without proof behind it won't hold up. What an inspection expects: an up-to-date parts catalog, real availability timelines, accessible manuals, and an actual intervention history linked to each product.

Documenting repairability concretely means:

  • Maintaining a structured and up-to-date spare parts catalog.
  • Knowing and tracking your real availability timelines.
  • Tracing each intervention (internal or through a repair network) and having it feed into the product passport.
  • Ensuring timestamped traceability of each repair, enforceable in case of inspection.

This is the role of a module like Repair: to structure and continuously feed repairability data — diagnostics, parts, interventions — so it automatically feeds the passport, without re-entry.

Repairability and DPP: The Two Are Linked

Repairability is not an isolated exercise. In the ESPR logic, it is one of the data points that the digital product passport must carry. And each repair performed should update this passport.

📌 The Virtuous Circle

A product repaired through a traced flow automatically enriches its DPP: the passport reflects the real state and maintenance history. Result: repairability that is no longer declared once and for all, but documented continuously, event after event.

And repairability alone is not enough: it combines with verified durability (inspection and grading, via a module like Recheck) to form a truly credible DPP. Repairability proves that the product can be repaired; verification proves its actual state. Together, the two make a passport that holds up to audit.

How to Structure Your Product Repairability

  1. Audit your parts catalog — what is available, at what lead time, at what price.
  2. Organize technical documentation — manuals accessible to professionals and consumers.
  3. Structure the repair workflow — a process (internal or repair network) that tracks each intervention.
  4. Connect to the passport — each repair automatically updates the product's DPP.
  5. Combine with condition verification — inspection/grading complements repairability for a credible DPP.

💡 Repairability as a commercial asset

Well-documented repairability is not just a constraint: it extends your products' lifespan, fuels a valuable after-sales service, and builds trust in the second-hand market. A legal requirement transformed into a customer loyalty argument.

FAQ — Repairability Index and ESPR

What is the difference between the repairability index and ESPR? The repairability index is a pioneering French initiative. ESPR generalizes this logic at the European scale and integrates repairability as a data point in the digital product passport.

What criteria make up repairability? Primarily: disassemblability, availability of technical documentation, availability of spare parts, their price, and category-specific criteria (software for electronics, for example).

How do you prove a product's repairability? By maintaining an up-to-date parts catalog, real availability timelines, accessible manuals, and most importantly, a traced and timestamped history of interventions linked to each product.

Should repairability be included in the DPP? Yes. In the ESPR logic, repairability is one of the data points that the digital passport must contain, and each repair should enrich this passport.

Are repairability and durability the same thing? No, but they are complementary. Repairability proves that the product can be repaired; verified durability proves its actual condition. Together, the two make a DPP credible.


🚀 Take Action

Is your repairability data documented or only declared? Book a demo to see how to structure your products' repairability and connect it to your DPP. Or dive deeper with the white paper "The DPP is not a QR code".


ZI
ZIQY
Content Team

Want to go from theory to practice? Discover ZIQY Rental management software.

Request a demo

Passez de la théorie à la pratique.

Réservez une démo de 30 minutes — on part de vos produits.

Request a demo